THURSDAY, Feb. 17 (HealthDay News) -- Cyclists using special
bike-only tracks that are physically separated from street traffic
have fewer accidents compared to bikers pedalling alongside motor
vehicles, a new study finds.
"We found that there is a 28 percent lower injury rate when bicycling on cycle tracks, compared with bicycling in parallel and comparable roads," noted study lead author Anne Lusk, a research associate in the department of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston.
"Of course, intersections do have to be well-designed, ideally with red and green bicycle signals," Lusk added. "And even then, we're not suggesting that cycle tracks have zero risk. But rigorous research does show that the difference in the accident rate is real."
Lusk and her team report their findings in a recent issue of
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
about 51,000 American cyclists suffered injuries as a result of
encounters with motor vehicles in 2009, with such accidents
accounting for two percent of all traffic fatalities in the United
States (according to 2008 figures).
So it's not surprising that surveys have consistently shown that
many American cyclists -- particularly women, seniors, and parents
who cycle with their children -- are afraid of pedaling on
Although designated bike lanes kept wholly separate from the
road are a common feature in many other countries, they remain a
relatively rare phenomenon in the United States. In the U.S, bike
lanes typically consist of merely a painted stripe on the pavement
delineating cyclists' portion of the road.
In contrast, the Netherlands -- a country half the size of South
Carolina, with just under 17 million residents -- is home to about
18,000 miles of separate cycle tracks, the researchers noted. By
comparison, across the entire U.S. only about 20 miles of similar
bike-only tracks are currently in place, mainly in centers such as
New York City, Portland, Ore., and Seattle.
A lack of safe biking tracks might reinforce the car-centric
culture that predominates in the United States, Lusk's team said.
While more than a quarter of all Dutch commuters get around by bike
and 55 percent of Dutch cyclists are women, in the U.S. less than
one-half of 1 percent of Americans ride a bike to work and fewer
than one-quarter of those riders are women.
Differences in biking infrastructure are also accompanied by
starkly different accident rates: cycle injury rates are at least
26 times higher in the U.S. than in the Netherlands, the
In their study, Lusk and her team focused on the safety profile
of the urban bike lane system first set up two decades ago in
Injury and crash rates for six cycle tracks in Montreal were
compared with one or two alternative street routes per track.
Tracks and alternate streets (which lacked biking lanes) were
characterized as posing similar "traffic dangers" to riders in
terms of the type, number, and speed of cars on the road.
All the cycle tracks featured two-way cycle traffic (going both
with vehicular traffic and against it) on one side of the road,
from which they were separated by raised pavement, parking lanes,
and/or posts. Most of the alternate streets ran parallel to the
cycle track roads, and came to the same end-point intersections as
Local emergency response and police records were used to assess
injury and crash occurrences between 2000 and 2008. Injury severity
was not assessed.
The study found that 2.5 times as many bikers used the cycle
tracks compared with street routes without separated bike lanes.
But even with the increase in bike congestion, injury rates on the
cycle tracks remained either lower than or similar to equivalent
street routes, depending on the particular track.
And when they looked at all the cycle tracks together, the
research team pegged the overall relative risk of injury as 28
percent lower on the separated tracks versus biking on a street in
"Based on the lower relative safety risk, we think that the construction of cycle tracks should not be discouraged," Lusk said.
Susan Finn, chairwoman of the American Council for Fitness &
Nutrition in Washington, D.C, said Lusk's findings "all make
sense," given that the focus should be on encouraging, rather than
discouraging, the biking habit.
"I'm not necessarily talking about those people who are tremendous athletes with great skills who can perhaps handle sharing the road with cars," Finn noted. "I'm talking about those who would likely feel safer in a separated bike path, and therefore be more likely to actually get out and go biking in that kind of environment."
"So if what we want is to motivate people to be active and safe, regardless of the level of expertise, then it seems to me that a designated cycle path would really serve the majority of people we want to see getting out there," she added. "Those who maybe aren't the jocks but who want to engage in purposeful activity."
For more on bicycle safety, visit the
Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Copyright © EBSCO Publishing. All rights reserved.