WEDNESDAY, Nov. 9 (HealthDay News) -- An EEG, which measures
brain activity, appears to be able to detect awareness in some
patients thought to be in a permanent vegetative state, a new
Canadian study finds.
Functional MRI (fMRI) is also able to show whether an
unconscious patient has any awareness, but the high cost and
limited availability of these devices make the test prohibitive for
most patients, the researchers noted.
"We have been able to show that 20 percent of a group of 16 patients who, to the external world, appear to be unconscious are actually entirely conscious," said lead researcher Damian Cruse, a postdoctoral fellow at the Centre for Brain and Mind at the University of Western Ontario.
"When you think about the number of patients throughout the world who are considered to be in a vegetative state, 20 percent adds up to a large number of individuals who understand everything that is going on around them but are unable to show this," he said.
An EEG, also known as an electroencephalograph machine, can be
brought to a patient's bedside and could potentially provide every
patient with the opportunity to communicate with the outside world,
The report was published in the Nov. 10 online edition of
In this small study, 16 patients who had either traumatic brain
injury or non-traumatic brain injury, and who had been diagnosed as
being in a vegetative state, were tested with an EEG.
While undergoing the test, the researchers asked the patients to
imagine movements of their right hand and toes.
In addition to the 16 patients in a vegetative state, the
researchers also tested 12 healthy people.
Cruse's team found that three of the patients had appropriate
responses on the EEG even though they appeared physically
unresponsive. Two of these patients had suffered a traumatic brain
injury and the other had a non-traumatic brain injury.
There was no significant relationship between patients' clinical
histories and their ability to follow commands, the researchers
This finding could have profound implications for the patient,
their families and their health care teams, Cruse said. "An
exciting future possibility, which is our next primary aim, is to
develop this technique into a communication tool," he
"Since we now are able to demonstrate that potentially 20 percent of patients considered to be in a vegetative state are actually able to understand what we ask them, our next aim is to provide them with the ability to respond. Clearly, an ability to interact with their external world will greatly change the lives of any patients who are able to make use of this technique."
The next step is to be able to ask patients questions like: "To
answer yes, imagine moving your right-hand, to answer no, imagine
moving your toes," and one could tell their answer from their brain
activity, Cruse explained.
There are a number of technological hurdles to overcome in
interpreting patient responses, but these are not insurmountable,
Dr. Jonathan A. Friedman, director of The Texas Brain and Spine
Institute at Texas A&M Health Science Center College of
Medicine in Bryan, said that "the study is novel and potentially
"This study adds to a growing body of knowledge suggesting that the vegetative state is more complicated and diverse than previously thought," Friedman said.
Dr. Jaime Levine, medical director of brain injury
rehabilitation at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City, said
that "there is nothing worse than a patient who is conscious, but
has been diagnosed as vegetative. So, a test that was portable
could prove useful."
Such a test could identify patients who have "rehabilitation
potential." In addition, it could help families make decisions
about treatment and end-of-life care, Levine said.
However, Morten Overgaard, head of the Cognitive Neuroscience
Research Unit at Aarhus University in Denmark and author of an
accompanying journal editorial, said there are two important
problems with the study.
"First of all, almost all cognitive functions are found to work both consciously and unconsciously in healthy people. So, if people follow a command it's not an absolute clear indication that they are conscious of the instruction."
So, if an EEG were going to be a test to determine which
patients will be treated and which patients won't be treated, the
test is not strong enough to make that determination, Overgaard
The second point has to do with how people are classified as
being in a vegetative state. The current criteria have nothing to
do with subjective experience patients might have. So these tests
are too blunt to really identify which patients will benefit from
treatment, he said.
"If you want to talk about whether these people are conscious, we need a new and different scale," Overgaard said. "This finding should not be used to just say some patients were misdiagnosed, but rather to challenge the categories we use now to talk about consciousness."
For more on coma, visit the
U.S. National Library of Medicine.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Copyright © EBSCO Publishing. All rights reserved.