THURSDAY, Feb. 7 (HealthDay News) -- Doctors may sometimes be
too pessimistic about a patient's potential for recovery after a
major bleeding incident occurs in the brain, a new study
As a result, some families could be deciding to stop their loved
one's life support too soon, pre-empting the possibility of
successful rehabilitation and recovery from a certain form of
The research found that more than one-third of people who have
had life support stopped after having a type of bleeding in the
brain called an intracerebral hemorrhage -- considered the most
lethal form of stroke -- might have eventually regained an
acceptable level of functioning if the life support had been
According to the American Stroke Association, hemorrhagic stroke
accounts for about 13 percent of the 795,000 stroke cases that
occur every year in the United States.
"It has become clear that we're probably not fantastic at predicting outcomes in these patients," said Dr. David Tirschwell, lead study author and co-director of the University of Washington Stroke Center at Harborview, in Seattle. "There seems to be some built-in pessimism among doctors about how patients will do."
According to Tirschwell, the crystal ball can often be rather
cloudy in these cases. Most decisions to withdraw life support are
made by a spouse or family members in consultation with physicians
in the first few days after hospitalization from the intracerebral
hemorrhage, he noted.
The new research suggests that this time frame is often too soon
for doctors to be able to offer a reliable estimate of the
patient's chances for recovery. "People can look pretty bad today,
but it's hard to make the leap about what things might be like a
number of months down the line," he explained.
Intracerebral hemorrhage results from a weakened vessel that
ruptures and bleeds into the surrounding brain. The blood
accumulates and compresses the surrounding brain tissue.
The study, scheduled to be presented Thursday at the American
Stroke Association's annual meeting in Honolulu, estimated what
outcomes might have occurred among a group of patients if they had
had more aggressive care.
The researchers began by studying the records of a group of 590
patients 18 years or older who had severe intracerebral hemorrhages
and were admitted to Seattle's Harborview Medical Center between
2005 and 2008.
From those patients' records, they identified factors that could
be associated with the withdrawal of life support, such as age;
functional status before the brain attack; degree of brain damage;
size of the hemorrhage; preexisting medical conditions such as high
blood pressure, diabetes and atrial fibrillation (a dangerous form
of irregular heartbeat); first temperature after hospitalization;
and whether the patient had a breathing tube in place for
The researchers then matched 78 people who were removed from
life support with 78 who were not, making sure each pair shared a
similar set of factors. The study found that about 38 percent of
patients who had had life support withdrawn might have had an
acceptable outcome if life support had continued.
Tirschwell described the study as "more of a demonstration than
proof of anything in particular," noting that it does show that a
positive outcome is possible in patients for whom that may not have
been predicted. He also noted that for some older patients with low
levels of functioning before the hemorrhagic stroke, it might not
be inappropriate to withdraw life support.
"It's complex; our message only is to be cautious in predicting outcomes and don't be overly pessimistic," Tirschwell said.
Because this study was presented at a medical meeting, the data
and conclusions should be viewed as preliminary until publication
in a peer-reviewed journal.
Why might physicians be prone to be overly pessimistic about
these patients? Tirschwell said he thinks many of the health care
providers in hospitals don't have either a long-term perspective or
the benefit of seeing how many of these people progress through
He also explained that physicians and family members often
overestimate the challenge of potential disability when they're
deciding if they should withdraw life support. "Even if Dad loved
to play golf [and won't be able to do that anymore], people have an
amazing ability to adjust to new circumstances. They often report a
very acceptable quality of life," Tirschwell said.
But Dr. Rafael Ortiz, director of the Center for Stroke and
Neuro-Endovascular Surgery at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City,
expressed some concerns about the study. He said that while more
cases may be reversible than ever before recognized, physicians
need to be sensitive to how people would define a "good quality of
life" for themselves.
"For some, it is going back to work and having a completely normal life," he noted. "Some people go back to a normal life. But the majority will have some disability, and some will have severe disability or death."
Find out more about hemorrhagic stroke at the
EBSCO Information Services is fully accredited by URAC. URAC is an independent, nonprofit health care accrediting organization dedicated to promoting health care quality through accreditation, certification and commendation.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Copyright © EBSCO Information Services. All rights reserved.