TUESDAY, April 9 (HealthDay News) -- Although students who get
free or discounted lunches through federal programs are more likely
to be obese than students who don't, kids in states that set higher
standards for these meals are less likely to suffer that fate, new
"Students who participate in the school lunch program tend to be more obese in general, not because of the program itself but because they usually come from lower-income households where obesity is more of a problem," explained study author Daniel Taber, a research scientist with the Health Policy Center of the Institute for Health Research and Policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
"So, what we looked at was a state-by-state comparison of the gap in obesity between those kids who participate in the school lunch program and those who don't," Taber said. "And what we saw was that the gap was smaller in states that exceeded the USDA [U.S. Department of Agriculture] standard."
Taber and his colleagues report their findings online April 8 in
First established in 1946, U.S. National School Lunch Program
(NSLP) meals are now consumed daily by about 32 million
schoolchildren across the United States. Participation is offered
to those from households where income levels are low enough to
Although lauded for its intent, the federally funded program is
administered at the state -- rather than federal -- level, and it
has faced criticism for often not meeting current USDA nutritional
To explore the effect of any differences, the team took a
snapshot of nearly 4,900 eighth-grade students across 40 states in
Body mass index (or BMI, a measurement based on height and
weight) and obesity data on the students was gleaned from a
national study launched in 1998 to track a nationally
representative sample of school kids.
Some of the kids got free or discounted NSLP lunches; some
purchased food at school at market rates; and some got their
lunches from home or elsewhere.
The investigators found that in states where USDA nutritional
standards were exceeded, just about 21 percent of the NSLP children
were found to be obese, compared with a little more than 17 percent
of non-NSLP children.
However, that spread was much wider in states serving
at-standard meals, with 26 percent of NSLP kids deemed obese
compared with just under 14 percent of non-NSLP students.
Similarly, BMI gaps were also greater in states where minimum
standard meals were offered.
What's more, the researchers found that students consuming
healthier meals were
notmore likely to seek other sources (such as vending
machines or fast-food establishments) for less nutritional sweet or
salty foods and/or sugary drinks.
That said, Taber said that going forward there is reason to be
optimistic, given that states are now in the process of updating
the NSLP laws that had been place when the study was conducted to
more closely match updated USDA standards. The newer standards
place a greater emphasis on the importance of preparing meals that
include whole grains, fruits, vegetables and skim milk, while
cutting back on trans fats.
"What this means is that what had been above-standard during our study will now be standard," he noted. "So, essentially those states that had been providing meals that exceeded previous USDA standards were ahead of the curve. And they saw benefits as a result, as opposed to those states that only met outdated minimums, and therefore missed an opportunity to lower obesity risk."
In an accompanying editorial, Marion Nestle, a professor in the
department of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York
University in New York City, said the findings are important
because they highlight the government's key role in "leveling the
playing field," so that all children are exposed to quality
nutrition rather than junk food.
"The food industry cannot make significant changes on its own because food companies are beholden to stockholders' concerns about returns to investors," she said. "Consumer demand also doesn't work in the face of millions of dollars spent on food marketing, advertising and lobbying," Nestle pointed out.
"[But] if you take junk food and sodas out of schools, kids don't eat as much of them and are healthier," Nestle said. "If you have strict nutrition standards for school food, the food is healthier and so are the kids. This may seem self-evident, but now we have research to prove it."
For more on the U.S. National School Lunch Program, visit the
U.S. Food and
EBSCO Information Services is fully accredited by URAC. URAC is an independent, nonprofit health care accrediting organization dedicated to promoting health care quality through accreditation, certification and commendation.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Copyright © EBSCO Information Services. All rights reserved.