WEDNESDAY, Dec. 15 (HealthDay News) -- U.S. Food and Drug
Administration advisers urged the agency to take a new look at data
that may indicate potential safety problems with dental fillings
that include mercury.
The FDA had ruled in 2009 that mercury used in so-called amalgam
dental fillings is safe.
"We need to see where the science is and if there are gaps," said the panel's chairwoman, Dr. Marjorie Jeffcoat, a dentist and researcher with the University of Pennsylvania, CNN reported.
The advisory panel noted that the FDA's 2009 decision was solid,
based on scientific findings available at the time. The panel also
stressed that more studies need to be done on the fillings,
especially in children,
The FDA advisory panel met in response to challenges from
consumer and dental groups that contended the FDA relied on flawed
data when it set the guidelines for mercury safety levels. Critics
of fillings that use mercury as a component contend that they can
pose neurotoxic health risks, especially to fetuses and young
In July 2009, the FDA placed tighter safety controls on the use
of mercury dental fillings, but said they were safe for most
Since that time, the agency has categorized the fillings as
Class II devices, which puts them into the middle range of risk.
Class II devices usually carry some kind of precautions regarding
But FDA officials said at the time of the 2009 vote that the
fillings pose no real harm to most people.
"Patients are not at risk for long-term, mercury-related adverse health events," Dr. Susan Runner, of the FDA's Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices, said during a July 28, 2009, news conference. "There have only been 141 adverse event reports over 20 years. None resulted in death."
The FDA did recommend in 2009 the following labeling changes: a
warning against the use of these fillings in patients with mercury
allergy; a warning that dental professionals use adequate
ventilation when handling the material for the fillings; and a
statement discussing the scientific evidence on the benefits and
risks of dental amalgam.
"We're not contraindicating dental amalgam in any patient group [other than those who have allergies]," Runner said at the news conference.
The 2009 ruling brought an angry reaction from the consumer
organization Consumers for Dental Choice.
"I'm outraged. FDA broke its word," Charles Brown, the group's national counsel, said at the time of the 2009 vote. "They put a warning a year ago on the Web site and promised to keep those warnings on the Web site that warned of neurological damage to children and unborn children. Bowing to the dental products industry, FDA has, for the first time in memory, withdrawn a warning about neurological harm to children and the unborn. It's a contemptuous attitude toward lower income and minority children because they're the ones that get amalgam. The rich get resin."
The agency decision followed a lengthy debate on the supposed
dangers of these fillings, which included a lawsuit filed in 2006
against the FDA by several consumer groups, including Moms Against
Mercury and Consumers for Dental Choice.
As part of that settlement, the FDA agreed to classify mercury
fillings, also known as dental amalgam, by July 28, 2009, and
posted a notice on its Web site that said: "Dental amalgams contain
mercury, which may have neurotoxic effects on the nervous systems
of developing children and fetuses."
Dental amalgam contains elemental mercury combined with other
metals such as silver, copper, tin and zinc. The fillings, about 50
percent mercury, have been used for generations to stabilize
decaying teeth. Dental experts contend that when mercury is bound
to the other metals, it's "encapsulated" and doesn't pose a health
risk. Consumer groups, however, contend that mercury, a known
neurotoxin, does leak out in the form of mercury vapor and then
gets into the bloodstream.
According to the American Dental Association, the use of amalgam
is declining. In 1990, dental amalgams made up 67.6 percent of all
dental restorations, but by 1999 it was 45.3 percent and, in 2003,
an estimated 30 percent. Cavities that previously would have been
treated with dental amalgam are now mostly filled with a resin
Several countries have already either banned or advised against
the use of mercury fillings.
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention has more on amalgam fillings.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Copyright © EBSCO Publishing. All rights reserved.