THURSDAY, Sept. 1 HealthDay News) -- After rising steadily
through the 1990s, the rate of circumcisions for newborn American
boys has waned a bit over the past decade, a new report shows.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC), circumcisions among newborn males dropped from 62.5 percent
in 1999 to just under 57 percent by 2008. That data came from the
National Hospital Discharge Survey, and was corroborated by similar
results from other nationwide sources.
"Newborn male circumcision levels in the U.S. remain relatively high, but have declined slightly," said agency spokesman Scott Bryan.
The report examines trends in newborn circumcision in hospitals,
and therefore underestimates the overall level of newborn
circumcision, Bryan noted. "The results of the analysis indicate
that approximately 55 to 57 percent of males born in hospitals are
now being circumcised there," he said.
The recent drop in the circumcision rate reverses a trend of the
late 1980s and 1990s, when the procedure rose from about 48 percent
of newborn boys (in 1988-1991) to over 61 percent (in
The CDC doesn't have a definitive answer as to what's behind the
recent decline. According to Bryan, changes in parental preferences
and the fact that many state Medicaid plans do not cover the
procedure could play roles.
"In fact, a recent study found that, after controlling for other factors, hospitals in states in which Medicaid covers routine male circumcision had circumcision rates that were 24 percentage points higher than hospitals in states without such coverage," Bryan noted.
The longstanding controversy over circumcision of newborns has
heated up recently, with opponents claiming it is not medically
justified and can lead to mental health issues later in life.
On Wednesday, the California Senate passed a bill preventing
cities in that state from banning newborn circumcisions. The move
came after a controversial ballot initiative, begun earlier this
year in San Francisco, which would have banned circumcision in that
city for people under the age of 18. A judge in July ruled against
the proposal and it was struck from the ballot.
Dr. Jeff Brosco, a professor of pediatrics at the University of
Miami Miller School of Medicine, said that "there is some evidence
that circumcision improves the health of boys."
Some of the benefits of circumcision include helping to prevent
urinary tract infections and making it less likely to transmit
sexually transmitted diseases, Brosco said. "But the evidence is
not so strong that we routinely recommend it," he added. "It's
really up to families."
As far as the critics of circumcision go, Brosco said "there is
no evidence that there are real dangers associated with
circumcision," he said. "In the long-term the benefits seem to
outweigh the risks," he added.
However, Brosco agreed that there is no health effect on the
infant if he is
The report was published in the Sept. 2 issue of the CDC's
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more about
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Copyright © EBSCO Publishing. All rights reserved.