THURSDAY, Dec. 22 (HealthDay News) -- Laying rest to a
long-simmering controversy, editors at the journal
Science have retracted a paper that pinpointed a specific
virus as the likely cause of chronic fatigue syndrome.
The 2009 report suggested that xenotropic murine leukemia
virus-related virus (XMRV) was the probable culprit behind chronic
fatigue syndrome (CFS), which causes crippling fatigue, aching
joints, headaches and other symptoms in about 1 percent of the
Follow-up findings failed to confirm the report, leading to
Thursday's unusual action.
Science announced the retraction to media today; it will be
published in the Dec. 23 issue of the journal.
Science has lost confidence in the Report and the validity of
its conclusions," said Bruce Alberts, editor-in-chief of the
journal, in a statement.
"We regret the time and resources that the scientific community has devoted to unsuccessful attempts to replicate these results," he added.
While the retraction ends speculation about the research,
conducted by scientists from three institutions, it also dashes
hopes that a cause for this mysterious malady had finally been
"The original publication . . . raised hopes and expectations for an expedited route to better diagnostics, treatment and validation for the millions whose lives have been devastated by CFS," said a statement issued Thursday by the Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome (CFIDS) Association of America. "Over the past two years, those hopes have been tempered by the lack of supporting evidence for a claimed association between CFS and [these viruses]."
One study published earlier this year dealt a blow to the virus
theory when it found that the XMRV pathogen spotted in human
samples in the first study were the result of contamination. At
that time, the
Science editors issued an unusual "expression of
In another paper published in
Science in September, nine laboratories, including two
involved in the 2009 report, tested the original human blood
samples used in that study.
This time, the only labs to detect XMRV were the two from the
original study and, even then, they found the virus just as often
in people with CFS as in healthy controls.
In all, at least 20 studies have failed to replicate the
original results, according to the CFIDS Association statement.
Normally, a retraction comes from the study authors, rather than
the publication itself. In this case, Alberts said, most of the
authors were willing to retract the report, but they could not
agree on the wording of a statement.
Science's opinion that a retraction signed by all the authors
is unlikely to be forthcoming," Alberts stated. "We are therefore
editorially retracting the Report."
The journal's statement also said it had evidence of poor
quality control regarding some of the research. And Alberts noted
that after questions arose about the validity of the study, the
authors admitted they had left out important information.
Although disappointed, some experts have said that the debacle
has a silver lining, in that it has brought renewed attention to
The CFIDS Association agreed.
"The heightened visibility that has resulted from this high-profile research has drawn new scientific and media interest to this serious, complex condition," the organization stated. "The CFIDS Association will translate the momentum it has generated to expand research aimed at early detection, objective diagnosis and effective treatment."
According to the CFIDS Association statement, "the emphasis
should shift to other solid leads for improved patient care."
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Copyright © EBSCO Publishing. All rights reserved.