MONDAY, Feb. 18 (HealthDay News) -- Two studies, one from the
United States and the other from New Zealand, add more fuel to the
long-standing claim that exposure to television -- especially
violent TV -- can harm children.
The studies aren't definitive, however, and each offers a
different view of TV's impact on kids.
The New Zealand study, for example, looked at a group of
children who grew up to have a high rate of criminal convictions
and found those who watched the most TV had the most problems.
In the American study, however, preschool children randomly
assigned to watch educational and "pro-social" shows appeared later
to be better behaved than kids who watched regular programming.
"It's not just the bad behaviors that they get from TV. They can get good behaviors, too," said the U.S. study's lead author, Dr. Dimitri Christakis, director of the Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development at Seattle Children's Research Institute.
For a variety of reasons, researchers have had a hard time
figuring out whether TV is actually harmful to kids. If children
watch a lot of violent TV and then misbehave or become violent, it
could be because they're naturally drawn to that kind of
programming and not directly influenced by it, experts say. Or
something else, such as parenting or genetics, could explain
The New Zealand study tracked 1,037 children into adulthood (age
26) to see what happened to them. They were born in 1972 and 1973
in Dunedin on New Zealand's South Island.
The investigators found that those who watched the most TV when
they were between the ages of 5 and 15 grew up more likely to have
a criminal conviction or have an antisocial personality disorder.
The study doesn't definitively prove that watching TV caused
criminal activity or aggression, but the researchers found that
other factors (including poverty levels and IQ) didn't play a
"The findings support a lot of other research that indicates that watching a lot of television in childhood can lead to antisocial behavioral problems later in life," said study co-author Dr. Bob Hancox, an associate professor in the department of preventive and social medicine at the University of Otago in Dunedin.
The study is unusual because 27 percent of the males had a
criminal conviction by age 26, and a remarkable 19 percent of them
were convicted of a violent crime. Hancox, however, said the
researchers don't think these numbers are especially high.
The study authors don't know if the television that the children
watched was especially violent; the country only had two channels
at the time, and many shows were from overseas, Hancox said. "We
cannot say from our study whether it is the violent content or just
watching TV that is most important," he added.
In the U.S. study, the Seattle researchers analyzed what
happened to 565 kids aged 3 to 5 who were randomly assigned to
watch either regular programs on TV or educational and "pro-social"
programming. In essence, the idea was to substitute shows like
"Mister Rogers' Neighborhood" for "Power Rangers," Christakis
After six months, those who watched the educational programming
scored better on a test of "social competence and behavior" that
was given to their parents.
It's not clear what the score difference made for the children
in real life. However, the tests aimed to examine things such as
whether kids are cooperative, non-aggressive and
Christakis noted that these traits aren't signs of docile
children. "I view them as desirable," he said.
The big message is that the kind of television that kids watch
matters, he added.
"All television is educational. It's just a matter of what it's teaching," Christakis said.
In an editorial accompanying the studies, which are scheduled
for publication in the March issue of the journal
Pediatrics, Dr. Claire McCarthy of Boston Children's
Hospital and Harvard Medical School, echoed that thought.
Reiterating the American Academy of Pediatrics' long-standing
recommendation of limiting kids' TV time to no more than two hours
a day, she said, "It is time to change our approach."
McCarthy explained that "We need to switch our emphasis to
outcomes and not screen time, because it is outcomes that matter. .
. . It is a variation on the 'if you can't beat 'em, join 'em'
idea. If the screens are going to be on, let's concentrate on the
content, and how we can make it work for children."
The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more about
EBSCO Information Services is fully accredited by URAC. URAC is an independent, nonprofit health care accrediting organization dedicated to promoting health care quality through accreditation, certification and commendation.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Copyright © EBSCO Information Services. All rights reserved.