-- Mary Elizabeth Dallas
FRIDAY, April 19 (HealthDay News) -- Gender plays a role in how
researchers perceive the work of other scientists, according to a
Researchers at Ohio State University found that scientific
studies written by men were viewed as higher quality than identical
studies listing female authors. This gender bias, they noted, is
significant and will have important implications over the course of
a woman's career in science.
"In grant proposals, promotion and tenure reviews, hiring decisions and so on, a scholar's sex will be a relevant factor in how she or he is evaluated," study lead author Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, associate professor of communication at The Ohio State University, said in a university news release. "All of these small factors will add up over the course of a career and may prevent some women from reaching the same career heights as men."
The study was published online recently in the journal
In conducting the study, the researchers asked nearly 250
graduate students in communication from universities around the
United States to read and evaluate 15 short summaries, or
abstracts, of studies presented at an academic conference. Some of
the studies listed two male authors, while others listed two female
The researchers also rotated the authors listed on the studies.
As a result, some participants thought certain studies were
authored by men, while others thought they were written by
The summaries were rated for quality, including how "important"
and "innovative" they were. The study revealed that, overall, the
summaries written by men were rated more highly than those with
female authors. Women involved in the study did not differ from
male participants in how they perceived the summaries. The
researchers noted that 70 percent of the study participants were
women, which could help explain why a difference was not found.
"The participants were reading abstracts of 150 words or so and rating their quality," Knobloch-Westerwick said. "The author names were not displayed prominently and the grad students probably barely glanced at them -- but still they had this effect."
The study also revealed that topics played a role in how
participants viewed the research summaries. Topics traditionally
associated with men, such as political communication, computers,
and news and journalism, were rated more highly when written by
The participants also were asked if they would like to discuss
research and collaborate with one of the study's authors. The
studies on traditionally "male" topics that were written by men
garnered more interest. Similarly, female authors had more
collaboration interest if their work involved stereotypically
"female" topics (such as children, parenting and body image).
The researchers said the findings demonstrate that it may be
more difficult for women to succeed in academic science. The
preference for male authors, they suggested, is partly due to
conservative gender norms.
"There's still a stereotype in our society that science is a more appropriate career for men than it is for women," Knobloch-Westerwick said. "Even among young graduate students -- the faculty of tomorrow -- such stereotypes are still alive."
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission provides more
EBSCO Information Services is fully accredited by URAC. URAC is an independent, nonprofit health care accrediting organization dedicated to promoting health care quality through accreditation, certification and commendation.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Copyright © EBSCO Information Services. All rights reserved.