WEDNESDAY, July 3 (HealthDay News) -- In a surprise
announcement, the Obama administration said Tuesday evening that it
was delaying implementation of a key part of its landmark
health-reform law -- the requirement that employers with more than
50 workers offer insurance coverage by Jan. 1, 2014 or face
The new deadline for providing such coverage is now Jan. 1,
2015, administration officials announced on blog postings.
Administration officials said the delay was prompted by concerns
from business leaders that the reporting system needed to carry out
the coverage mandate was complex and made it difficult to meet the
Jan. 1, 2014 deadline.
"We have heard concerns about the complexity of the requirements and the need for more time to implement them effectively. We recognize that the vast majority of businesses that will need to do this reporting already provide health insurance to their workers, and we want to make sure it is easy for others to do so," Mark Mazur, assistant secretary for tax policy at the Treasury Department, wrote in a blog posting.
Business groups had complained that the employee coverage
provision was too complicated and welcomed the delay in its
There was no advance indication of the Obama administration's
decision, which came as a "pleasant surprise," Randy Johnson,
senior vice president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, told the
Neil Trautwein, a vice president of the National Retail
Federation, said, "We commend the administration's wise move. It
will provide employers and businesses more time to update their
health care coverage without threat of arbitrary punishment."
Helen Darling, president and CEO of the National Business Group
on Health, called the delay "terrific news for large employers." It
buys time to make needed changes to health-benefits programs and
provides relief from reporting requirements and compliance with
complex rules, she said in a statement.
Under the employer provision, companies with 50 or more workers
must provide affordable coverage to all full-time employees or face
the risk of escalating tax penalties. The requirement was expected
to have the largest impact on major chain hotels, restaurants and
retail stores, the
Some companies with payrolls near the 50-worker cutoff point
said they would consider eliminating jobs or switching some
full-time workers to part-time status to avoid having to offer
The New York Timesreported.
Several observers speculated that the delay could threaten the
ultimate goal of the 2010 Affordable Care Act -- to offer insurance
coverage to an estimated 30 million Americans who currently don't
"I am utterly astounded," Sara Rosenbaum, a professor of health law and policy at George Washington University and a supporter of the law, told the Times. "It boggles the mind. This step could significantly reduce the number of uninsured people who will gain coverage in 2014."
The hospital industry deemed the announcement "troubling" for
people who will not get job-based coverage next year. "The goal of
the ACA [Affordable Care Act] was to extend coverage to the
uninsured, which required a shared responsibility from all
stakeholders," Rich Umbdenstock, president and CEO of the American
Hospital Association, said in a statement. "We are concerned that
the delay further erodes the coverage that was envisioned as part
of the ACA," he said.
Valerie Jarrett, a senior advisor to President Barack Obama,
sought to downplay such concerns. "We are full-steam ahead for the
marketplaces opening on October 1," she wrote on her White House
blog Tuesday evening.
The marketplaces Jarrett referred to are another key component
of the Affordable Care Act -- so-called health insurance exchanges
where consumers can purchase coverage.
The state-based insurance exchanges are supposed to operate a
website where uninsured residents of the state and small employers
can compare various health-plan options offered by insurance
companies, much in the same way that consumers shop online for
hotel rooms and airplane tickets that suit them best.
Tuesday's announcement of the delay in implementing employer
insurance coverage does not affect the central provision of the
Affordable Care Act -- that most Americans carry health insurance
or face a fine in the form of a tax penalty. This so-called
"individual mandate" was upheld as constitutional last year by the
U.S. Supreme Court.
Caroline Pearson, vice president of the Washington, D.C.-based
consulting firm Avalere Health, told
HealthDaythat she doesn't think the delay will have a
"material impact" on insurance coverage next year. "I think really
this is the administration politically trying to show flexibility
to employers who were expressing concerns about the reporting
requirements," she explained.
Kosali Simon, a professor in the School of Public Health and
Environmental Affairs at Indiana University in Bloomington, agreed.
"In the long run, a year of a delay is not a really big deal," she
To learn more about the Affordable Care Act visit the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
EBSCO Information Services is fully accredited by URAC. URAC is an independent, nonprofit health care accrediting organization dedicated to promoting health care quality through accreditation, certification and commendation.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Copyright © EBSCO Information Services. All rights reserved.