|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
MR Accurate in Detecting Residual Disease Following Lumpectomy Behind the Cancer Headlines® May 8, 2003 Some breast cancer
patients who undergo a lumpectomy should then be considered for an MR
examination because MR is an accurate way to look for any disease left in the
breast, two new studies show. Information on residual disease is vital in
determining the best treatment for these women. In one study,
radiologists reviewed 100 patients who had undergone a lumpectomy, whereby the
tumor and closely surrounding areas were removed. When the tumor specimen was
looked at under a microscope it showed that the cancer had spread to or near
the edge (margins) of the specimen. These women then had
an MR examination to look for any residual disease, says Elizabeth Morris, MD,
a radiologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, and lead
author of the study. Fifty-eight of the women had disease left over after
lumpectomy, says Morris. Overall, MR imaging identified 86% of residual
disease, she says. "It was most
accurate (90%) in identifying residual disease that was in a different quadrant
than the lumpectomy site; it was least accurate (78%) in identifying unifocal
residual disease, that is disease that was within 2 cm of the lumpectomy site,"
Morris says. A separate study of
22 women (23 breasts) with ductal carcinoma in situ confirms Morris' numbers.
In the study, "MR imaging identified residual disease near the lumpectomy
site in 18 of the 23 breasts (78%)," says Jennifer Menell, MD, clinical
assistant radiologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Nine of the women
also had a mammogram, adds Menell. MR was able to identify residual disease in
seven of these nine patients, while mammography was only able to identify
residual disease in six patients. Not all of the
patients in this study had positive margins, notes Menell. Two of the patients
had the radiologic examination following lumpectomy to determine the extent of
disease. Two patients had
surgery outside of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and information on
whether they had positive margins or not wasn't available, says Menell. "MR imaging
provides us with a window to the breast that we haven't had before and maps out
for us how extensive the disease really is," says Morris. "If tumor
extent can be accurately gauged, appropriate treatment can be planned,"
adds Menell. Menell and Morris
presented their studies at the American Roentgen Ray Society Annual Meeting in
San Diego. SOURCE: Annual Meeting of the
American Roentgen Ray Society, May 7, 2003, San Diego, CA DISCLAIMER!Behind the Cancer Headlines (TM) is a service of Willis-Knighton Cancer Center.The articles in Behind the Cancer Headlines (TM) are written by national medical editorsand writers who review current literature and develop timely articles in non-technicallanguage. Sources of information are cited for each article. If you have questions, referto the sources listed or to your physician. Willis-Knighton Cancer Center is notresponsible for content. Articles are updated on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. This information is provided for information only and is not a substitute for informationfrom or care by a physician. |
|
If you have comments, questions or problems with this website, please contact: webmaster@wkhs.com Willis-Knighton Health System. All rights reserved. |
|
| Home | Staff | Equipment | Patient Info | Links/Clinical Trials | Treatments | News Articles | Directions/Map | Center for IMRT |