|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Sampling Breast
Fluid to Detect Cancer Behind the Cancer Headlines® A new method of extracting and
analyzing fluid from a woman's breast may provide a more accurate, less
expensive and noninvasive way to determine a patient's risk for breast cancer
or to diagnose the disease in its early stages. In a paper published in the journal
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment,
Battelle scientists at the Department of Energy's
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and researchers at University of California,
Los Angeles report they have discovered six times more proteins than previously
identified in this fluid, called nipple aspirate fluid, or NAF. The presence of
such proteins suggests that NAF could be a resource for biomarkers, or
biological indicators, of breast cancer. "We believe this fluid could
be the best alternative for discovering biomarkers for early-stage breast
cancer," said Rick Zangar, a Battelle
principal investigator at PNNL. "With further analysis, we could detect up
to 10 times more proteins in NAF. The more proteins we identify, the better
chance there is to find one that is linked to breast cancer." Proteins can serve as biomarkers
of disease. When cancerous cells begin to develop, they create their own
proteins that, if detected in NAF, could indicate the presence or risk of
breast cancer. Current methods for screening include breast self-exams and
mammograms, which are physical exams compared with the molecular approach at
PNNL. NAF is continuously secreted and
reabsorbed in breasts of women who aren't pregnant or lactating. It is
generated from cells lining the ducts that form a network throughout the
breast, the same network that provides milk in a lactating woman. These ductal
cells are the source of 70 to 80 percent of breast cancers. "NAF offers a unique window
through which we can monitor the processes occurring inside the breast ductal
system," Zangar said. "The medical
community recognizes that one way to markedly decrease mortality from breast
cancer would be a more accurate, noninvasive method for early diagnosis. Our
approach suggests there could be other options available." The NAF samples were collected
using an enhanced process that is less painful than other extraction methods,
yet obtains just as much fluid. It was developed by co-author Chandice Covington, Professor and Chair, Primary Care
Nursing at UCLA School of Nursing. While NAF has been studied for
more than 25 years, most extraction methods have been painful. Through "Women need early mechanisms
for detecting potential or existing disease," Zangar and colleague Susan Varnum
analyzed the NAF samples using high-throughput mass spectrometers located in
the William R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, a DOE
national user facility located at PNNL. Of the 65 proteins identified, 15 of
them, or 23 percent, have been previously implicated as potential biomarkers
for breast cancer. This implies that NAF provides a useful sample for analysis
of known breast cancer biomarkers, while offering the possibility of providing
novel biomarkers not yet identified in blood samples. The results are promising, but Zangar also noted there are more questions that need to be
addressed. "Will a biomarker show up
sooner in NAF than in blood? We don't know yet, but we do know that NAF is a
concentrated source of proteins specifically released by breast cells. A marker
protein released into the blood, on the other hand, is more diluted, and it's
more difficult to determine where in the body the protein came from," he
said. Zangar and his team hope to secure additional funding to further
study the proteins identified in NAF using a protein microarray
they developed that can screen dozens of proteins simultaneously. SOURCES: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Department of Energy, Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory (http://www.pnl.gov) DISCLAIMER!Behind the Cancer Headlines (TM) is a service of Willis-Knighton Cancer Center.The articles in Behind the Cancer Headlines (TM) are written by national medical editorsand writers who review current literature and develop timely articles in non-technicallanguage. Sources of information are cited for each article. If you have questions, referto the sources listed or to your physician. Willis-Knighton Cancer Center is notresponsible for content. Articles are updated on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. This information is provided for information only and is not a substitute for informationfrom or care by a physician. |
|
If you have comments, questions or problems with this website, please contact: webmaster@wkhs.com Willis-Knighton Health System. All rights reserved. |
|
| Home | Staff | Equipment | Patient Info | Links/Clinical Trials | Treatments | News Articles | Directions/Map | Center for IMRT |