Researchers Set
Benchmarks for Screening Mammography
Behind the Cancer Headlines®
A recent study of medical audit data
funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) revealed that community
mammography screening results surpass performance recommendations across
the
"With a cancer detection rate of 4.8 per 1,000 women,
our results show that most radiologists who are reading mammograms are
performing well," said Robert D. Rosenberg, M.D., lead researcher and
professor of radiology at the
Up until now, there has been no national measurement with which radiologists could compare their individual cancer detection rates.
"There have been no data available for mammographers in the
In the study, data were collected from six NCI-funded research sites, for a total of nearly 2.6 million screening exams assessed by 807 radiologists. Each radiologist's assessment, along with every woman's outcome within 12 months of the initial screening exam, were tallied. The radiologists included in the analysis came from urban, rural, large and small practices of different organizational structures, across broad geographic areas.
Approximately 10 percent of mammograms yielded abnormal findings, for a recall rate of 9.8 percent.
"We found that radiologists are much more likely to err
on the side of caution, for a higher recall rate," said co-author Bonnie Yankaskas, Ph.D., professor of radiology at the
After additional imaging work-up, cancer was ultimately diagnosed in 4.8 of 1,000 women. When a radiologist identified significantly abnormal findings and advised that biopsy be performed immediately, 34 percent of biopsy results yielded cancer.
The majority of women examined were 40 to 70 years old. Of all reported cancers, 21.6 percent proved to be ductal carcinoma in situ, and 78.4 percent were invasive cancers. Of invasive cancers, 37.2 percent were small tumors measuring 10 millimeters or less in diameter, 41.6 percent were mid-sized tumors measuring 11 to 20 millimeters, and 21.2 percent were large invasive tumors measuring 2 centimeters and larger.
The authors hope that their findings will allow radiologists to evaluate and improve the accuracy of their individual cancer detection rates when reading mammograms.
"Recalls and additional biopsies do add to the cost and
anxiety of mammography," said
SOURCE:
Radiology, October 2006
Radiological Society of North America (http://www.rsna.org)